🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is claiming compensation valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This action is a direct response from the Kremlin regarding proposals to use immobilized Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to reports in local news outlets, the monetary authority filed a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the stated $230 billion demand.

EU leaders are set to decide in the coming days on a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and financial stability.

Most of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary keeper for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union authorities have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the fact that title of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in EU jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has labeled any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of reciprocal measures, including seizing EU private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Wider Implications

With statements seen as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious assault on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States."

The clearing house refused to comment on the latest lawsuit. The institution has in the past stated it is facing over 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in European nations are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if such holdings can be located," commented a legal expert from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials said they are developing steps to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are crafting protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the detailed plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.

Ukraine would solely be obligated to repay the money in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast destruction inflicted during the ongoing conflict.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, however, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear signal that if you do all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."